[Cocci] [PATCH] Coccinelle: make DEBUG_FILE option more useful

Masahiro Yamada yamada.masahiro at socionext.com
Thu Oct 26 03:49:28 CEST 2017


Hi Julia,


2017-10-15 18:55 GMT+09:00 Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall at lip6.fr>:
> Make coccicheck checked for the existence of DEBUG_FILE on each semantic
> patch, and bailed if it already existed.  This meant that DEBUG_FILE was
> useless for checking more than one semantic patch at a time.  Now the check
> is moved to the start of make coccicheck, and the 2> is changed to a 2>> to
> append to the file on each semantic patch.  Furthermore, the spatch command
> that is run for each semantic patch is also added to the DEBUG_FILE, to
> make clear what each stdout trace corresponds to.
>
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall at lip6.fr>
>

I think this is a good improvement,
and looks almost good to me.

Just one nit.


>
>  }
>
> +if [ "$DEBUG_FILE" != "/dev/null" -a "$DEBUG_FILE" != "" ]; then
> +       if [ -f $DEBUG_FILE ]; then
> +               echo "Debug file $DEBUG_FILE exists, bailing"
> +               exit
> +       fi
> +       touch $DEBUG_FILE

I think this "touch" is redundant.

If the DEBUG_FILE does not exist, 2>> will automatically create it.




> +else
> +       DEBUG_FILE="/dev/null"
> +fi
> +
>  if [ "$COCCI" = "" ] ; then
>      for f in `find $srctree/scripts/coccinelle/ -name '*.cocci' -type f | sort`; do
>         coccinelle $f
>



-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada


More information about the Cocci mailing list