[Cocci] [PATCH 0/2] detect identical chip data arrays
julia.lawall at lip6.fr
Mon Oct 9 10:40:14 CEST 2017
On Mon, 9 Oct 2017, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> 2017-10-09 5:44 GMT+09:00 Julia Lawall <julia.lawall at lip6.fr>:
> > On Sun, 8 Oct 2017, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> On Sun, Oct 08, 2017 at 09:18:39PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> >> > Rename battery.cocci as check_bq27xxx_data.cocci and adjust the warning
> >> > messages to indicate that some structures are the same, in response to
> >> > feedback from Liam Breck.
> >> >
> >> > Although check_bq27xxx_data.cocci says is requires Coccinelle 1.0.7, which
> >> > is not yet released, it actually works with the version currently available
> >> > on Github, eg from Coccinelle commit 3ba77b3a0f91.
> >> I think the rename makes sense, but I would expect the move to
> >> happen in one go with "git send-email -M", so that it detects the
> >> rename.
> > I'm not actually sure what is the status of the previous version.
> > Masahiro said applied, but I downloaded his tree and it was not there. So
> > I thought this way would be easier.
> My tree is here:
> I had applied your patch a few days before.
OK, I got that tree, but it seemed to go only up to October 1. But maybe
I did not pick the right branch.
> BTW, how should I handle this series?
> 1/2 is reverting it.
> So, I can drop the previous one entirely,
> then pick up 2/2 only.
> Is this a good thing to do?
That would be perfectly fine with me. You can drop 1/2 already. For 2/2,
it would be nice to have an Ack from Liam first.
> Best Regards
> Masahiro Yamada
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
More information about the Cocci