[Cocci] [PATCH] coccinelle: flags.cocci: reorganize patterns to improve efficiency
julia.lawall at lip6.fr
Wed Nov 15 15:51:04 CET 2017
On Wed, 15 Nov 2017, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Hi Julia,
> 2017-11-13 1:08 GMT+09:00 Julia Lawall <julia.lawall at lip6.fr>:
> > An initial rule just matching a function call makes it possible to focus
> > on one all at a time, which improves performance in complex functions with
> > multiple locking calls. Using a constraint expression lock2 != pre.lock1;
> > makes it possible to eliminate the double matching of the lock, lock
> > sequence.
> > Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall at lip6.fr>
> If I apply this patch, locks/flags.cocci does not work for me.
> $ make coccicheck COCCI=scripts/coccinelle/locks/flags.cocci
> MODE=report DEBUG_FILE=log.txt
> Please check for false positives in the output before submitting a patch.
> When using "patch" mode, carefully review the patch before submitting it.
> 607 610
> coccicheck failed
> $ cat log.txt
> /usr/bin/spatch -D report --no-show-diff --very-quiet --cocci-file
> scripts/coccinelle/locks/flags.cocci --no-includes --include-headers
> --dir . -I ./arch/x86/include -I ./arch/x86/include/generated -I
> ./include -I ./arch/x86/include/uapi -I
> ./arch/x86/include/generated/uapi -I ./include/uapi -I
> ./include/generated/uapi --include ./include/linux/kconfig.h --jobs 8
> --chunksize 1
> Fatal error: exception Failure("meta: parse error: \n = File
> \"scripts/coccinelle/locks/flags.cocci\", line 29, column 20, charpos
> = 607\n around = 'pre', whole content = expression lock2 !=
> Could you check it?
What version of Coccinelle do you have?
But the way, Thierry Martinez should get in touch with you shortly about
the badzero problem.
More information about the Cocci