[Cocci] [PATCH v2 2/5] Documentation: Add doc for runchecks

Julia Lawall julia.lawall at lip6.fr
Sat Dec 16 17:32:23 CET 2017



On Sat, 16 Dec 2017, Knut Omang wrote:

> On Sat, 2017-12-16 at 17:17 +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > Dear Knut,
> >
> > Does this document need any more syntax checking and further review besides
> > the places which were indicated by Julia Lawall?
> >
> >
> > > +Two classes of configuration is available.
> >
> > +Two classes … are available. …
> >
> >
> > > +checker is does not provide any suppression. Check type namespaces are
> >
> > +checker does not …
> >
> >
> > > +The checker implementations of the ``typedef`` command also allows
> >
> > +The checker implementations … allow
> >
> >
> > > +allow builds with ``C=2`` to pass even for subsystems that has not yet done
> >
> > … subsystems that have not …
> >
> > Regards,
> > Markus
>
> I hope not,..
> Believe it or not, I do know the grammar rules although it might not
> look that way here :) Always good to get a native english
> speaker to review though.
>
> I'll take these in for v3 as well and carefully review myself
> for any further errors of the same sorts..

It's a lot of text.  Anyone can make mistakes :)  Thanks for the work.

julia

>
> Thanks,
> Knut
> _______________________________________________
> Cocci mailing list
> Cocci at systeme.lip6.fr
> https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
>


More information about the Cocci mailing list