[Cocci] [PATCH v2 2/5] Documentation: Add doc for runchecks

Knut Omang knut.omang at oracle.com
Sat Dec 16 17:26:16 CET 2017


On Sat, 2017-12-16 at 17:17 +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> Dear Knut,
> 
> Does this document need any more syntax checking and further review besides
> the places which were indicated by Julia Lawall?
> 
> 
> > +Two classes of configuration is available.
> 
> +Two classes … are available. …
> 
> 
> > +checker is does not provide any suppression. Check type namespaces are
> 
> +checker does not …
> 
> 
> > +The checker implementations of the ``typedef`` command also allows
> 
> +The checker implementations … allow
> 
> 
> > +allow builds with ``C=2`` to pass even for subsystems that has not yet done
> 
> … subsystems that have not …
> 
> Regards,
> Markus

I hope not,..
Believe it or not, I do know the grammar rules although it might not 
look that way here :) Always good to get a native english 
speaker to review though.

I'll take these in for v3 as well and carefully review myself 
for any further errors of the same sorts..

Thanks,
Knut


More information about the Cocci mailing list